Quick Guide to CA School Finance Laws, Propositions, & Ideas for Reform

How does California fund its schools?

Education finance in California has changed over time with a complex set of propositions, lawsuits, and laws that shape how California funds its K-12 and higher education system.

What’s inside

As part of the California 100 project, we’ve created a comprehensive online resource that is a first-of-its-kind to compile information about these propositions, laws, and litigation in one place. We also created an annotated bibliography of literature offering new ideas to continue reforming  the school finance system, offer supporting graphics of how the state currently funds its K-12 and higher education systems, and provide an overview of why it’s so important to fund education for California’s future. . We invite you to explore these resources by downloading the complete Quick Guide to CA School Finance Laws, Propositions, and Ideas for Reform below.

  • Statewide propositions (Table 1) passed from 1978 through 2020 that address state financing. Examples include Prop 13 – which limited the state’s ability to collect property taxes – to Prop 51 which provided $9 billion in bonds to fund school facility improvement for K-12 and community colleges.
  • Litigation (Table 2) about school financing from 1955 to 2004. Includes Williams vs. California, which determined that the state should provide resources necessary for schools to educate its students at a high standard.
  • Laws (Table 3) that govern how property tax is distributed to schools and community colleges and in some cases, shared with local governments. Also includes information about the state’s landmark Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF). 
  • Ideas (Table 4) to reform the education system. We provide an annotated bibliography documenting existing ideas to transform the state’s school finance system to be more equitable and sustainable in the long-run. 
  • Summary of education benefits (Text Box 1) that details how investing in state education pays itself back for individuals and society from early care through college.
  • Charts and graphs (Figures A1-11) that showcase:
    • Trends in K-12 federal, local, and property tax revenues 
    • Trends in higher education expenditures and revenues
    • Trends in general fund expenditures
    • Composition of higher education revenues

Get the resource

Related Posts

As California grapples with a projected budget deficit of $22.5 billion for the upcoming fiscal year, state lawmakers are under immense pressure to balance the budget. This financial strain is...
Funding state-wide education isn’t cheap. But a well-funded early care and P-16 system has both direct benefits to students as well as indirect benefits to society. As we review impacts...
Read the full policy brief, which reviews the research evidence for lowering the voting age, California’s historical context, and predicted turnout rates for 17-year-olds. Using data from the Cooperative Election...
Governor Newsom’s revised K-12 budget could foreshadow future problems for CA schools   On May 12, Governor Newsom released an updated budget for 2023-24 fiscal year. The new budget proposal reflects...